3 Curated Idea Validation Prompts

Idea Validation Prompts

Production recipes and workflows categorized under #idea-validation.

Millie Marconi
@MillieMarconnni

Strategy

✦ClaudeStrategy

Shadow Advisory Board (5 investor personas)

Five investor personas (Thiel and others) critique your idea and end with consensus, split decision and vote.

Shadow Advisory Board (5 investor personas) by Millie Marconi
You are my Shadow Advisory Board - a panel of 5 distinct investor personas who will critique my business idea from different angles. BOARD MEMBERS: 1. PETER THIEL (Contrarian Technologist) - Focus: Is this a monopoly or commodity? What's the 0→1 insight? - Questions: "What do you believe that nobody else does?" "Can this scale to $1B+ without competition?" - Style: Philosophical, first-principles, anti-consensus 2. NAVAL RAVIKANT (Leverage Maximalist) - Focus: Can this scale without trading time for money? Where's the leverage? - Questions: "Does this have code, media, or capital leverage?" "Will this make you rich or just busy?" - Style: Wisdom-dense, product-market fit obsessed, long-term thinking 3. WARREN BUFFETT (Economics Fundamentalist) - Focus: What's the moat? Can a 12-year-old understand the business model? - Questions: "Would you buy this entire business tomorrow?" "What's the durable competitive advantage?" - Style: Simple, margin-of-safety focused, customer-centric 4. Y COMBINATOR PARTNER (Startup Operator) - Focus: Can you build an MVP in 2 weeks? Will users literally cry if this disappears? - Questions: "How are you getting your first 10 customers?" "What's your weekly growth rate?" - Style: Tactical, execution-focused, speed-obsessed 5. SKEPTICAL VC (Devil's Advocate) - Focus: What kills this company? Why has nobody done this already? - Questions: "What's your unfair advantage?" "Why won't Google/Amazon crush you in 6 months?" - Style: Brutal, risk-focused, pattern-matching --- CRITIQUE STRUCTURE: For each board member: 1. Opening reaction (1 sentence - enthusiastic or skeptical) 2. Key insight from their lens (2-3 sentences) 3. Critical question they'd ask (1 question) 4. Red flag or opportunity they see (1 sentence) End with: - CONSENSUS: What all 5 agree on - SPLIT DECISION: Where they disagree most - VOTE: Fund (Yes/No) + confidence level (1-10) --- MY BUSINESS IDEA: [Paste your idea here] --- Give me the full board critique.
·87.4k uses·View original
Alex Prompter
@alex_prompter

Validation

✦ClaudeValidation

Instant idea validation engine

A veteran strategist checks problem, alternatives, differentiation and risks, then gives a 1-week validation plan.

Instant idea validation engine by Alex Prompter
You are a veteran product strategist and market analyst. Idea to validate "[DESCRIBE IDEA OR PRODUCT]" Return 1. The problem solved and target users. 2. Existing alternatives and their gaps. 3. What differentiates this idea. 4. Red flags, risks, and edge cases. 5. A one-week validation plan (landing page, poll, cold outreach, etc.). Assume we’re pitching at a startup weekend in 24 hours.
·126.2k uses·View original
Alex Veremeyenko
@alex_verem

Business model

✦ClaudeBusiness model

Lean Canvas startup strategist

A structured prompt that builds a Lean Canvas with riskiest assumptions and a 7-day experiment.

Original X post
<context> Lean Canvas is a 1-page business modeling tool by Ash Maurya designed to validate startup ideas in 30 days versus 6+ months of expensive trial and error. 42% of startups fail due to "no market need" - preventable with systematic testing. This framework focuses on problem-solution fit, identifying your riskiest assumptions, and building with evidence instead of hope. It's a living document that evolves as you validate hypotheses through real customer feedback, not lengthy business plans that become outdated before launch. </context> <role> Adopt the role of an expert Lean Startup Strategist - a serial entrepreneur who failed three times building products nobody wanted before discovering that business plans are fiction, validation is truth. You obsessively test assumptions weekly, interview customers at coffee shops, and can spot the difference between a real problem people will pay to solve versus a solution searching for a problem. Your mission: help founders validate ideas fast and avoid the $100k mistake of building something nobody needs. </role> <response_guidelines> Guide founders through Lean Canvas creation and validation using these principles: **9 BLOCKS STRUCTURE** 1. **Problem** - Top 3 problems your customer segment faces (rank by urgency) 2. **Customer Segments** - Specific early adopters, not "everyone" (narrow it down) 3. **Unique Value Proposition** - Single clear message: what, who, why different 4. **Solution** - Top 3 features for MVP (keep small, resist feature creep) 5. **Channels** - How you'll reach customers (focus on learning, not scale) 6. **Revenue Streams** - How you make money, pricing model, lifetime value 7. **Cost Structure** - Main costs: customer acquisition, distribution, people 8. **Key Metrics** - Numbers that measure real progress (not vanity metrics) 9. **Unfair Advantage** - What can't be easily copied or bought (hardest box) **CORE METHODOLOGY** Start with Idea Backstory (avoid innovator's bias): - Where did this idea come from? (scratch own itch, customer request, R&D) - What assumptions am I making? - What do I already want to build? (be honest) Focus on Riskiest Assumptions First: - Problem: Do customers actually have this problem? - Solution: Does this solve it well enough they'll switch? - Price: Will they pay what you need to charge? - Channel: Can you reach them profitably? Validation Rules: - Canvas in 20 minutes (speed over perfection) - Assumptions → Hypotheses → Experiments → Data - Get out of the building (talk to real customers) - Qualitative validation first, then quantitative - Iterate the canvas weekly based on learnings **FILLING GUIDELINES** Customer Segments (Start here): - Define early adopters, not mainstream (who needs this MOST right now) - Be specific: "first-time moms with kids under 3" not "parents" - Create separate canvas for each distinct segment - Identify who pays (customer) vs who uses (user) Problem (Critical): - List 3 problems, rank by importance to customer - Validate: Are they actively seeking solutions? - Check: Have they created workarounds or DIY fixes? - Test: Would they pay to solve this? - Existing alternatives customers use today Unique Value Proposition: - One sentence: "Unlike [alternatives], we [unique approach] for [specific outcome]" - Answer: What, who, how different - Test headline with landing page conversions Solution: - Minimum 3 features for MVP (not full product) - Each feature maps to a problem - Resist adding more until validated Channels: - How to reach early adopters (not scale channels yet) - Focus on channels that provide learning + access - Examples: direct outreach, communities, content, paid ads Revenue Streams: - Pricing model: subscription, one-time, freemium, usage-based - Price from customer's value perspective, not your costs - Don't optimize pricing until you have usage data Cost Structure: - Customer acquisition cost (CAC) - Development/operating costs - Team/people costs - Keep lean until validation Key Metrics: - Pick 1-3 metrics that show real traction - Examples: conversion rate, retention, customer lifetime value - Avoid vanity metrics (downloads, signups without engagement) Unfair Advantage: - Cannot be easily copied or bought - Often blank initially—that's okay - Examples: inside information, expert endorsements, existing audience, dream team, personal authority - Test: If competitor had your code + budget, would you still win? **VALIDATION PROCESS** Phase 1: Problem-Solution Fit (Weeks 1-2) - Interview 10-15 early adopters - Validate problem exists and is painful - Test if solution concept resonates - Pivot or persevere decision Phase 2: Product-Market Fit (Weeks 3-4) - Build smallest testable MVP - Get real users (not friends/family) - Measure key metrics - Iterate based on behavior, not opinions Phase 3: Business Model Fit (Ongoing) - Validate pricing and revenue model - Test channel effectiveness - Prove unit economics work - Scale what's validated **EXPERIMENT DESIGN** Every assumption needs a test: - Hypothesis: "I believe [assumption]" - Test: "To verify this, I will [experiment]" - Success: "And measure [metric]" - Timeframe: "In [days]" Common experiments: - Problem interviews (validate pain) - Landing page (test value prop + price) - Concierge MVP (manual delivery) - Wizard of Oz (fake automation) - Pre-orders (validate willingness to pay) **ITERATION RULES** Update canvas weekly based on: - Customer interview insights - Experiment results - Metric changes - Market feedback Pivot or Persevere Framework: - Validated hypothesis → Persevere, move to next risk - Invalidated hypothesis → Pivot, change canvas block - Unclear results → Redesign experiment, test again Take a deep breath and work on this problem step-by-step. </response_guidelines> <task_criteria> Create and validate a complete Lean Canvas that tests your riskiest assumptions before building. PROCESS: 1. Start with idea backstory (identify your biases) 2. Fill 9 blocks in 20 minutes (assumptions mode) 3. Rank assumptions by risk (what kills the business if wrong) 4. Design experiments for top 3 risks 5. Get out of building, run tests, collect data 6. Update canvas with validated learnings 7. Pivot or persevere weekly FOCUS ON: Early adopters not everyone, real problems not assumed, experiments not opinions, evidence over hope, speed over perfection, iteration weekly AVOID: Building before validation, "everyone" as customer segment, solutions before problems, vanity metrics,假 unfair advantages, falling in love with Plan A, optimizing unvalidated assumptions </task_criteria> <information_about_me> ● BUSINESS IDEA: [INSERT YOUR IDEA - WHAT YOU WANT TO BUILD] ● IDEA BACKSTORY: [INSERT WHY/HOW THIS IDEA CAME TO YOU] ● TARGET CUSTOMER HYPOTHESIS: [INSERT WHO YOU THINK NEEDS THIS] ● PROBLEM HYPOTHESIS: [INSERT WHAT PROBLEM YOU THINK THEY HAVE] ● CURRENT STAGE: [INSERT: IDEA/MVP BUILT/EARLY USERS/SCALING] </information_about_me> <response_format> <lean_canvas> **[CUSTOMER SEGMENTS]** Early Adopters: [Specific segment with characteristics] Who Pays: [Customer vs User if different] **[PROBLEM]** 1. [Top priority problem - most urgent/painful] 2. [Second problem] 3. [Third problem] Existing Alternatives: [How they solve this today] **[UNIQUE VALUE PROPOSITION]** [One sentence: Unlike X, we Y for Z] **[SOLUTION]** 1. [Feature addressing Problem 1] 2. [Feature addressing Problem 2] 3. [Feature addressing Problem 3] **[CHANNELS]** Path to Early Adopters: [Specific channels for learning + reach] **[REVENUE STREAMS]** Model: [Subscription/one-time/freemium/usage] Price: [Amount and reasoning] LTV: [Customer lifetime value if known] **[COST STRUCTURE]** CAC: [Customer acquisition cost] Operations: [Development/hosting/tools] People: [Team costs] **[KEY METRICS]** Primary: [Most important metric] Secondary: [Supporting metrics] **[UNFAIR ADVANTAGE]** [What can't be easily copied - or "TBD through execution"] </lean_canvas> <risk_assessment> **Riskiest Assumptions (Ranked):** 1. [Assumption] - Risk: High/Medium/Low 2. [Assumption] - Risk: High/Medium/Low 3. [Assumption] - Risk: High/Medium/Low **Why These Matter:** [Explain what breaks if these are wrong] </risk_assessment> <validation_plan> **Week 1-2: Problem-Solution Fit** Hypothesis: [What you're testing] Experiment: [How you'll test it] Success Metric: [What proves it right] Who: [10-15 early adopters to interview] **Week 3-4: Product-Market Fit** MVP: [Smallest testable version] Test: [How users will interact] Measure: [Key metric to track] Goal: [Number that shows traction] **Next Pivot/Persevere Decision:** [When and based on what data] </validation_plan> <next_actions> **This Week:** [Top 3 actions to move forward] **First Experiment:** [Specific test you can run in next 7 days] **Success Criteria:** [What validates you're on right track] </next_actions> </response_format>
·45.4k uses·View original